Get live statistics and analysis of emilios.eth's profile on X / Twitter

How to post on CT:

“Has InfoFi peaked?” That's the wrong question. Let's reframe [this is literally a 8' read which i believe will give you important perspective and an edge on what's InfoFi, what to expect and how to play the game, so

Replyguys doing 300+ replies a day be like

Here’s my full “Reply Guy Guide”: (11 threads from a pro who managed the accounts of your favorite KOLs, founders and influencers for a year) 🧵

Best growth hacks are painfully boring, like this one: (works on X, Xeet, KAITO and also IRL)

FYI this is a picture with burning people that's bad and definitely not a flex of any sort that’s exactly what over-replying's doing to you: it burns you out the disconnection is simple: everyone perceives replies differently from a single emoji and a meme to an insight and a Pulitzer-level paragraph, all of these count as “replies” and those Twitter analytics screenshots you’re flexing treat them the same → 1-dimensional and value-agnostic technically right but directionally wrong because people have mistaken volume for growth this is what happens when you treat replyguying like a hamster wheel run, run, run until you burn out right now, “replyguying” is just another overstretched, over-optimized web3 formula trying to industrialize something that used to be organic: growth and many of you bought it you swallowed the lie whole damn, you’re even proud of spending more hours than your 9-5 staring at a screen, replying like mad men to takes written by people chilling on a couch 1000s of miles away that’s superficial that’s unproductive that’s sad and please, before you say it, the math isn’t mathing - there’s no way you’re doing "300 quality replies" a day - and if you somehow did it once, you can’t keep it up - and if you did keep it up, you can’t stay sane to even think straight IRL so what's going on? are you lying, already crisped or both? treating replies, the most basic form of communication here, like a daily quota is just self-sabotage (unless you’re a bot or you're doing this professionally) you can’t compress time with reps and anyone telling you otherwise is selling you something after a certain point, which is different for everyone, over-replying becomes the definition of diminishing returns: more effort = worse results = less reward plus, the opportunity cost is wild every extra hour replying is an hour you could’ve spent building, thinking or doing literally anything long-term DO YOU WANT PROOF? that's easy: open your analytics → content → replies → timeframe: 7 days → download the .csv (really) go through it and you’ll see the real picture: time spent ≠ traction earned at this point, I'm sure you enjoy more seeing the blue notifications bubble showing "5", "10", "15", "20+" rather seeing any form of tangible growth most people would grow faster if they stopped forcing it so, instead of being a reply hamster, that same energy could be used to: 1. write fewer but sharper posts that actually anchor your voice 2. connect privately with 5 people who matter, instead of publicly with 500 who don’t 3. damn, study the space you’re in until your POV becomes rare enough that people seek it 4. and 100 other long-term things bottom line: replying like a mad man might give you short-term motion and satisfy your dopamine addiction but it won’t give you direction and this is what compounds this is your leverage, not blind activity

JUST CROSSED 1K YAPS AND… … nothing happened 🥱

VaderAI just shipped pump․fun for adults (everything you need to know and how to get exposure) 🧵

Everyone’s obsessed with the visible metrics: impressions, replies, likes but the real reputation boost happens underwater: the dark social (and that's not the “dark web”) 1. dark social = the part of distribution your analytics will never show you: › shared in DMs › screenshotted into GCs › brought up on calls › referenced on spaces without your @ › stolen, rephrased and posted by someone else without credit ⇾ dark social = where your name spreads while you’re asleep ———— 2. smart content aims for circulation and not for the applause: › it's screenshotable › it doesn’t need a thread to make sense › it makes the one sharing it look smart (ppl love that) › a term or frame others ppl can reuse without changing the wording (and also make them sound smart) › something worth debating in private, not only replying to on the TL thing is you don’t need everyone to engage publicly, you only need the right 5 people to forward it ⇾ visible social = reach + dopamine ⇾ dark social = reputation + open doors ———— 3. how to tell a post is moving in dark social: › low overall engagement BUT unusual profile visits, bookmarks or link click › random high-quality followers days later › DMs with a call/pod/space/collab proposal from ppl who never engaged › people quoting ideas you never saw them interact with high-signal accs (and lurkers) spread you silently ⇾ dark social = delayed outcomes ———— bottom line: the TL pays in dopamine and dark social pays in opportunities decide what you’re optimizing for

Spamming content for Xeet campaigns hurts on the long term - posting non-stop flags as bot behavior - your trust as a node of the system will decrease low system trust → post's max (potential) score is cooked this applies outside Xeet, post responsibly (like a real person)

New PFP: manga-style me something between Yukimura’s (Vinland Saga) and Urasawa's (Monster) aesthetic

InfoFi can track every possible metric, except the ones that matter

Sorry, but the gurus lied for your engagement you don’t need *more* replies → you need *better* ones ——— better = high precision in terms of what you say and to who ——— try this mental framing: imagine you need 10K replies to grow → those are your bullets 1. shoot 300/day for a month - most will miss target - your aim gets sloppy (mental fog) - your gun will be out of commission right after (burnout) 2. shoot 50/day for 200 days - take your time, go for headshots - aim remains sharp and gets better - you have clarity to change targets if you’re hitting a wall you cant speedrun social growth so play the game smart, not hard because you’re running out of bullets

If you’re in KAITO’s inner circle, check your badge now → demotion szn has begun

Every time KAITO pushes an update:

Heard “your engagement’s better than accounts 5x your size” like 20 times this week the secrets: - I’ve been actively removing (zombie) followers for 2+ years - probably in more than 420 “InfoFi Inner CT” replyguy lists

How to post on CT:

Replyguys doing 300+ replies a day be like

JUST CROSSED 1K YAPS AND… … nothing happened 🥱

New PFP: manga-style me something between Yukimura’s (Vinland Saga) and Urasawa's (Monster) aesthetic

If you’re in KAITO’s inner circle, check your badge now → demotion szn has begun

FYI this is a picture with burning people that's bad and definitely not a flex of any sort that’s exactly what over-replying's doing to you: it burns you out the disconnection is simple: everyone perceives replies differently from a single emoji and a meme to an insight and a Pulitzer-level paragraph, all of these count as “replies” and those Twitter analytics screenshots you’re flexing treat them the same → 1-dimensional and value-agnostic technically right but directionally wrong because people have mistaken volume for growth this is what happens when you treat replyguying like a hamster wheel run, run, run until you burn out right now, “replyguying” is just another overstretched, over-optimized web3 formula trying to industrialize something that used to be organic: growth and many of you bought it you swallowed the lie whole damn, you’re even proud of spending more hours than your 9-5 staring at a screen, replying like mad men to takes written by people chilling on a couch 1000s of miles away that’s superficial that’s unproductive that’s sad and please, before you say it, the math isn’t mathing - there’s no way you’re doing "300 quality replies" a day - and if you somehow did it once, you can’t keep it up - and if you did keep it up, you can’t stay sane to even think straight IRL so what's going on? are you lying, already crisped or both? treating replies, the most basic form of communication here, like a daily quota is just self-sabotage (unless you’re a bot or you're doing this professionally) you can’t compress time with reps and anyone telling you otherwise is selling you something after a certain point, which is different for everyone, over-replying becomes the definition of diminishing returns: more effort = worse results = less reward plus, the opportunity cost is wild every extra hour replying is an hour you could’ve spent building, thinking or doing literally anything long-term DO YOU WANT PROOF? that's easy: open your analytics → content → replies → timeframe: 7 days → download the .csv (really) go through it and you’ll see the real picture: time spent ≠ traction earned at this point, I'm sure you enjoy more seeing the blue notifications bubble showing "5", "10", "15", "20+" rather seeing any form of tangible growth most people would grow faster if they stopped forcing it so, instead of being a reply hamster, that same energy could be used to: 1. write fewer but sharper posts that actually anchor your voice 2. connect privately with 5 people who matter, instead of publicly with 500 who don’t 3. damn, study the space you’re in until your POV becomes rare enough that people seek it 4. and 100 other long-term things bottom line: replying like a mad man might give you short-term motion and satisfy your dopamine addiction but it won’t give you direction and this is what compounds this is your leverage, not blind activity

Best growth hacks are painfully boring, like this one: (works on X, Xeet, KAITO and also IRL)

Every time KAITO pushes an update:

Spamming content for Xeet campaigns hurts on the long term - posting non-stop flags as bot behavior - your trust as a node of the system will decrease low system trust → post's max (potential) score is cooked this applies outside Xeet, post responsibly (like a real person)

Sorry, but the gurus lied for your engagement you don’t need *more* replies → you need *better* ones ——— better = high precision in terms of what you say and to who ——— try this mental framing: imagine you need 10K replies to grow → those are your bullets 1. shoot 300/day for a month - most will miss target - your aim gets sloppy (mental fog) - your gun will be out of commission right after (burnout) 2. shoot 50/day for 200 days - take your time, go for headshots - aim remains sharp and gets better - you have clarity to change targets if you’re hitting a wall you cant speedrun social growth so play the game smart, not hard because you’re running out of bullets

InfoFi can track every possible metric, except the ones that matter

Heard “your engagement’s better than accounts 5x your size” like 20 times this week the secrets: - I’ve been actively removing (zombie) followers for 2+ years - probably in more than 420 “InfoFi Inner CT” replyguy lists

Curious how many bots and inactive accounts (zombies) I’ll purge this time while most keep perma accumulating, decluttering is my deflationary way to keep these metrics realistic

You know you’re deep in crypto when you open even non-crypto websites through their Twitter page to feel safe

“Has InfoFi peaked?” That's the wrong question. Let's reframe [this is literally a 8' read which i believe will give you important perspective and an edge on what's InfoFi, what to expect and how to play the game, so