Get live statistics and analysis of will varney's profile on X / Twitter

"how do i scale ad creatives without hiring a designer or spending $10k on an agency?" i get this question 20+ times a week from ecom operators here's the truth: you DON'T need humans anymore you can generate 100+ brand-consistent Facebook ads per day for pennies using Google's new image model completely automated, professional-grade quality made an AI agent (Nano Banana) that replaced my entire creative team follow, like & comment "ads" and i'll send early access to your dm

coffee shops for work = poverty mindset. i never understood this ritual. you have a home. you pay rent/mortgage. you have wifi. you have coffee. but you pack up your shit, drive somewhere, pay $8 for coffee, fight for outlets, listen to shit music, and pretend this makes you productive? this is performing productivity, not being productive. watch coffee shop "entrepreneurs": - macbook covered in stickers (identity signaling) - typing furiously when anyone walks by (performance) - taking calls unnecessarily loud (validation seeking) - posting instagram story "grinding 💪" (attention begging) actual entrepreneurs are in boring rooms. alone. no audience. no aesthetic. just work. i have a $2M home office. know where i work most? in bed. on my phone. making deals in my underwear. location doesn't determine productivity. hunger does. coffee shops are where people go to feel like they're working without actually working. it's procrastination with props. "but i need the energy!" no, you need the excuse. "but i focus better!" no, you perform better. "but the networking!" nobody successful is networking at starbucks at 2pm on a tuesday. the real tell: productive people minimize location changes. they found what works. they repeat it. they don't need variety. they need results. if you need a coffee shop to work, you don't have a business. you have a hobby that requires an audience. harsh? good. stop performing success. start achieving it. the only grinding happening at coffee shops is coffee beans. everything else is theater.

i have a friend who's a genius. legit 160 IQ. and he's fucking broke. he spends his life thinking, researching, perfecting his "ideas." last year, i took one of his half-baked concepts, wrapped it in a landing page, and sold it for $30K in a weekend. he was furious. said i "bastardized his vision." i said "your vision doesn't pay rent." here's what smart people don't understand about money: the market doesn't care about your IQ. it cares about solving problems. my friend can explain quantum computing but can't explain his value in 10 seconds. meanwhile there's a kid selling "how to get girlfriends" who can't spell "algorithm" making $2M/year. intelligence is a curse if you overthink everything. stupidity is a blessing if you just ship. my friend has 47 business ideas in notion. zero launched. each one "needs more research." i have one idea: sell shit that works. launched 12 times. 3 worked. 9 failed. the 3 paid for everything. smart people optimize for being right. rich people optimize for being done. my friend could build the next google. but he won't. because it might not be perfect. while he's perfecting, someone dumber is profiting. the market rewards speed, not accuracy. first, not best. done, not perfect. gave my friend an ultimatum: launch something in 48 hours or i'd launch it for him and keep the profits. he launched. made $8K first week. more than his last 3 months of "research." intelligence without action is just elaborate procrastination. your genius friend isn't successful because they're too smart to be stupid enough to try.

most AI assistants rn are just glorified chat drawers w/ basic capabilities. building smth different - powerful backend + intuitive card-based UI that lets u quickly swipe thru results. Anyone want the full UI implementation guide?

here's what most people get wrong about AI writing tools: they treat it like a magic button my setup is different... MCP server scraping real profiles, Claude understanding context, all running on Cloudflare infrastructure you dump your raw thoughts → it spits out tweets that sound authentically YOU not some generic bot garbage

"just make your site mobile-friendly and conversions will improve" no mf fashion brands are bleeding $2.3M annually because mobile converts at 0.8% while desktop hits 3.2% - and nobody knows the 7 fixes that take 48 hours to implement same playbook that took one brand from $1.2M to $3.1M in 6 months by moving the add-to-cart button to thumb-reach and showing shipping costs upfront here's what separates $500k brands from $5M brands: - you: "mobile-optimized theme," 0.8% mobile conversion, losing $648k/year - them: express checkout prominent + sticky cart bar, 2.8% mobile conversion, printing $3M extra annually one streetwear brand made ONE change - put Apple Pay first instead of forms - went from 0.6% to 2.2% mobile conversion in 4 months because impulse buyers rage-quit when they see checkout forms we're giving away the complete FREE playbook: 7 tactical fixes (reorder product photos, thumb-optimized navigation, size guide overlay, shipping transparency) that anyone can implement this weekend with zero developers 72% of your traffic is mobile but it converts 4x worse than desktop - you're literally watching $2.3M walk away every year while you split-test button colors follow, like & comment "MOBILE" and i'll send the FREE 48-hour conversion playbook that turned 0.8% into 2.8% for brands doing $50M+ combined (one brand went $800k to $2.4M in 4 months)

meta's charging you a premium for sameness. you're out here changing the text color and thinking you cracked "creative diversity." meanwhile meta sees your 40 ads as the same fucking file. here's what actually works: ugc testimonial. unboxing. problem/solution. different people. different formats. different angles. one brand did this in october. cpas stayed flat for 6 months while everyone else's shit died at week 3. the secret? they planned it before burning money. most of you are just launching random shit and praying meta's black box saves you. it won't. that's why feisty creator exists. because "test more" isn't a strategy when you don't know what you're testing.

If your "circle" isn't actively discussing: -treason -how to get a 7th passport -illegal cock fighting rings -powder import/export -market manipulation -russian blondes -steaks -agartha -white monster -nicotine sources -horrible things you’ve done you’re NGMI bro

you don't need 50 income streams to hit $100k/month. you need one thing that prints and the discipline to not fuck it up. i watch kids with 40 tabs open, running dropshipping + affiliate marketing + AI automation + content agency + course creation + crypto trading. making $3k spread across everything. bleeding money on tools. drowning in complexity. meanwhile there's a guys selling one pdf about excel shortcuts for accountants. $100k/month. same pdf for 3 years. hasn't updated it once. here's what nobody tells you about scale: focus multiplies. diversification divides. one offer at $10k > ten offers at $1k why? because depth beats width every time: - one audience you understand completely > ten you barely know - one message refined 1000x > ten messages that sort of work - one funnel optimized to death > ten funnels you check sometimes - one support system perfected > ten systems held by duct tape the boring truth about everyone hitting real numbers: they found one thing that works and beat it to death. they ignored every shiny opportunity. they said no 1000x more than yes. they went deep while you went wide. your problem isn't lack of opportunity. it's lack of commitment. that course about amazon fba? you quit after 2 weeks. that saas idea? abandoned when it got hard. that agency? closed when the first client complained. pick one thing. give it 18 months. ignore everything else. most of you won't because focus feels like missing out. but missing out on 99 things to dominate 1 thing is the only arbitrage left.

you date for “love” i date to set up loans & open credit cards in her name we are not the same.

You can double your conversion rate with hostile UX if you're willing to ignore the hate mail. Your checkout page should be psychological warfare, not a pleasant experience. When users try to leave, don't offer discounts. Question their identity. "Are you sure you want to leave? [Yes, continue building my empire] [No, I prefer staying broke]." You're not negotiating price, you're attacking their self-image. Make subscriptions opt-out, not opt-in. Pre-select the recurring option in bright green while hiding the one-time purchase in gray text below. Canceling should require logging in, finding a hidden menu, and answering why they're giving up on their dreams. Don't ask if they want upsells. Just add them. Pre-check a box that says "Yes! Add the Profit Accelerator for just $50." The friction isn't in buying, it's in the psychological pain of actively unchecking the box and rejecting success. Add fake social pressure. "17 others viewing right now." "Sarah from Ohio just purchased." Is it real? Doesn't matter. It turns a private decision into public competition. Advertise free shipping everywhere then add a $9.95 "handling fee" at the final step. They've already entered their credit card. They're not abandoning over ten bucks. They'll curse you but they'll convert. Your job isn't making customers happy. It's making them buy. Most businesses can't afford to care about the difference.

guy i know makes $3M every december selling the dumbest thing possible. ugly christmas sweaters for accountants. then he disappears to thailand for 10 months. here's the stupidest business model that prints money: he doesn't innovate. he micro-niches into absurdity. - "ugly christmas sweaters for accountants" - "funny shirts for air fryer owners" - "mugs for left-handed dog trainers" the more specific, the more it sells. why? because broad is broken. "funny t-shirt" competes with millions. "funny shirt for pediatric nurses who love the office" competes with zero. his process: step 1: pick profession + interest + format accountant + dad jokes + sweater nurse + wine + mug programmer + cat + hoodie step 2: design takes 10 minutes in canva. intentionally mediocre. if it looks too professional, it loses authenticity. step 3: facebook ads targeted like a sniper: - men, 25-45 - job title: accountant - interests: the office, dad jokes, excel - behavior: engaged shoppers he's not targeting demographics. he's targeting one specific human. step 4: ad copy speaks their exact language: "your audit team isn't ready for this level of holiday cheer" "finally, a sweater that says 'i do taxes and I party'" conversion rate: 8.7% (industry average: 2%) because he's not selling clothing. he's selling the perfect office party joke. revenue breakdown: - november: $1.3M - december: $1.7M - rest of year: $0 (he's on a beach) ad spend: $300k cogs: $400k profit: $2.3M works every single year. the lesson? stop trying to innovate. find a micro-niche so specific it's funny. print their inside joke on fabric. charge $49 for $5 worth of material. innovation is expensive. stupidity is profitable. the dumber the idea, the better it sells. most of you are too smart to make real money.

why would you choose to be broke when you can just get rich? its literally that easy 😂

Day 3 of posting everyday ... is websockets / livekit strictly necessary for voice apps? Anyone use SSE for server response ?

woke up to GPT-5 dropping overnight and immediately started testing this is what I live for... it's like Christmas morning every time a new model launches. How is everyone finding it so far?

coffee shops for work = poverty mindset. i never understood this ritual. you have a home. you pay rent/mortgage. you have wifi. you have coffee. but you pack up your shit, drive somewhere, pay $8 for coffee, fight for outlets, listen to shit music, and pretend this makes you productive? this is performing productivity, not being productive. watch coffee shop "entrepreneurs": - macbook covered in stickers (identity signaling) - typing furiously when anyone walks by (performance) - taking calls unnecessarily loud (validation seeking) - posting instagram story "grinding 💪" (attention begging) actual entrepreneurs are in boring rooms. alone. no audience. no aesthetic. just work. i have a $2M home office. know where i work most? in bed. on my phone. making deals in my underwear. location doesn't determine productivity. hunger does. coffee shops are where people go to feel like they're working without actually working. it's procrastination with props. "but i need the energy!" no, you need the excuse. "but i focus better!" no, you perform better. "but the networking!" nobody successful is networking at starbucks at 2pm on a tuesday. the real tell: productive people minimize location changes. they found what works. they repeat it. they don't need variety. they need results. if you need a coffee shop to work, you don't have a business. you have a hobby that requires an audience. harsh? good. stop performing success. start achieving it. the only grinding happening at coffee shops is coffee beans. everything else is theater.

i have a friend who's a genius. legit 160 IQ. and he's fucking broke. he spends his life thinking, researching, perfecting his "ideas." last year, i took one of his half-baked concepts, wrapped it in a landing page, and sold it for $30K in a weekend. he was furious. said i "bastardized his vision." i said "your vision doesn't pay rent." here's what smart people don't understand about money: the market doesn't care about your IQ. it cares about solving problems. my friend can explain quantum computing but can't explain his value in 10 seconds. meanwhile there's a kid selling "how to get girlfriends" who can't spell "algorithm" making $2M/year. intelligence is a curse if you overthink everything. stupidity is a blessing if you just ship. my friend has 47 business ideas in notion. zero launched. each one "needs more research." i have one idea: sell shit that works. launched 12 times. 3 worked. 9 failed. the 3 paid for everything. smart people optimize for being right. rich people optimize for being done. my friend could build the next google. but he won't. because it might not be perfect. while he's perfecting, someone dumber is profiting. the market rewards speed, not accuracy. first, not best. done, not perfect. gave my friend an ultimatum: launch something in 48 hours or i'd launch it for him and keep the profits. he launched. made $8K first week. more than his last 3 months of "research." intelligence without action is just elaborate procrastination. your genius friend isn't successful because they're too smart to be stupid enough to try.

Day 3 of posting everyday ... is websockets / livekit strictly necessary for voice apps? Anyone use SSE for server response ?

"how do i scale ad creatives without hiring a designer or spending $10k on an agency?" i get this question 20+ times a week from ecom operators here's the truth: you DON'T need humans anymore you can generate 100+ brand-consistent Facebook ads per day for pennies using Google's new image model completely automated, professional-grade quality made an AI agent (Nano Banana) that replaced my entire creative team follow, like & comment "ads" and i'll send early access to your dm

telling a client "just checking in" is poverty language here's what actually works: stopped begging for replies started attacking WITH VALUE the weak follow-up: "circling back" "touching base" "any thoughts?" sounds like a homeless person asking for change the violent follow-up: pure aggression instead of: "checking on proposal" send: competitor's viral campaign subject: "they moved fast" instead of: "any questions?" send: loom showing their funnel bleeding money don't mention yourself instead of: "thoughts on our call?" send: screenshot of similar client's results "just closed another one" prospect ghosted me 3 weeks sent their competitor hitting #1 on producthunt "267 upvotes in 2 hours" replied in 8 minutes closed that afternoon…. Do you understand?

a lot of you have been asking about the differences between VEO3 and Sora2 for generating meta ad creatives In short: VEO3 for product shot with piece to camera, SORA2 for hooks/ anything else between the two you can create just about anything

most AI assistants rn are just glorified chat drawers w/ basic capabilities. building smth different - powerful backend + intuitive card-based UI that lets u quickly swipe thru results. Anyone want the full UI implementation guide?

here's what most people get wrong about AI writing tools: they treat it like a magic button my setup is different... MCP server scraping real profiles, Claude understanding context, all running on Cloudflare infrastructure you dump your raw thoughts → it spits out tweets that sound authentically YOU not some generic bot garbage

day 23 - Solo founders , do you bring on additional devs to squash bugs and risk your startup-child ? or plow through

keep at least one genuinely broke friend in your circle. not from loyalty. as a reality check. my rich friends discuss tax strategies, exit multiples, and server architecture. complete echo chamber. useless for understanding the actual market. my friend dave makes $31k/year. lives with his mom. drives a 2008 civic that makes concerning noises. when i stress about scaling issues, dave stresses about gas prices going up 30 cents. when i complain about my accountant, dave complains about overdraft fees. when i worry about finding good developers, dave worries about his laptop finally dying. dave is my direct line to reality. he's a walking focus group for the 95% of the market i'm trying to sell to. last week i showed him my new landing page. "looks expensive," he said. "that's good, right?" i asked. "not if you want my money." rewrote the entire page. conversions jumped 340%. dave doesn't know he's my most valuable advisor. thinks we're just friends from high school. we are. but his real value isn't his friendship - it's his poverty. every rich person needs a poor friend to remind them what the world actually looks like outside their bubble. your broke friend isn't a charity case. he's your radar for when you've lost touch with reality. the moment you can't relate to his problems, you can't sell to his demographic. and his demographic is 95% of the market. keep one broke friend. pay attention to his problems. those problems are worth millions if you solve them.

sent 10,000 cold emails last quarter. 0.3% booked calls using "best practices" 12% booked calls using this approach. here's the exact framework: stop starting with "i hope this finds you well" stop explaining who you are stop asking for 15 minutes stop being polite start with their problem in their language: "your mobile conversion is 0.8% while desktop is 3.2% that gap is costing you $2M annually" no introduction. no permission. just math that hurts. line 2 - prove you understand: "happens because mobile users won't type. they want to speak but you force them to text like it's 2002" line 3 - tease the solution: "3 fashion brands fixed this last month. average mobile conversion now 3.9%" line 4 - the close: "want to see exactly how?" that's it. no signature. no company name. no social proof. no calendar link. why this works: 1. specificity creates credibility (0.8% vs 3.2%) 2. pain before prescription (problem before solution) 3. peer pressure ("3 brands fixed this") 4. curiosity gap ("exactly how?") the replies are beautiful: "how do you know our conversion rates?" "who are the 3 brands?" "is this will?" "can we talk today?" compare to typical cold email replies: "unsubscribe" "not interested" *silence* here's what nobody understands: cold email isn't about you. it's about their pain at 2am. it's about their boss asking why numbers suck. it's about their competitor eating their lunch. when you make it about them, they respond. when you make it about you, they delete. templates everyone uses (0.3% response): - "we help companies like yours..." - "i noticed you're in the fashion space..." - "quick question..." - "do you have 15 minutes..." templates that print (12% response): - "you're losing $x because y" - "your competitor just did x" - "[specific metric] is below industry standard" - "saw this problem in your [specific thing]" stop asking for permission to pitch. start showing you already understand. the best cold email doesn't feel cold. it feels like insider information. send this structure 100 times this week. book more calls than you can handle. or ke

you don't need 50 income streams to hit $100k/month. you need one thing that prints and the discipline to not fuck it up. i watch kids with 40 tabs open, running dropshipping + affiliate marketing + AI automation + content agency + course creation + crypto trading. making $3k spread across everything. bleeding money on tools. drowning in complexity. meanwhile there's a guys selling one pdf about excel shortcuts for accountants. $100k/month. same pdf for 3 years. hasn't updated it once. here's what nobody tells you about scale: focus multiplies. diversification divides. one offer at $10k > ten offers at $1k why? because depth beats width every time: - one audience you understand completely > ten you barely know - one message refined 1000x > ten messages that sort of work - one funnel optimized to death > ten funnels you check sometimes - one support system perfected > ten systems held by duct tape the boring truth about everyone hitting real numbers: they found one thing that works and beat it to death. they ignored every shiny opportunity. they said no 1000x more than yes. they went deep while you went wide. your problem isn't lack of opportunity. it's lack of commitment. that course about amazon fba? you quit after 2 weeks. that saas idea? abandoned when it got hard. that agency? closed when the first client complained. pick one thing. give it 18 months. ignore everything else. most of you won't because focus feels like missing out. but missing out on 99 things to dominate 1 thing is the only arbitrage left.

guy i know makes $3M every december selling the dumbest thing possible. ugly christmas sweaters for accountants. then he disappears to thailand for 10 months. here's the stupidest business model that prints money: he doesn't innovate. he micro-niches into absurdity. - "ugly christmas sweaters for accountants" - "funny shirts for air fryer owners" - "mugs for left-handed dog trainers" the more specific, the more it sells. why? because broad is broken. "funny t-shirt" competes with millions. "funny shirt for pediatric nurses who love the office" competes with zero. his process: step 1: pick profession + interest + format accountant + dad jokes + sweater nurse + wine + mug programmer + cat + hoodie step 2: design takes 10 minutes in canva. intentionally mediocre. if it looks too professional, it loses authenticity. step 3: facebook ads targeted like a sniper: - men, 25-45 - job title: accountant - interests: the office, dad jokes, excel - behavior: engaged shoppers he's not targeting demographics. he's targeting one specific human. step 4: ad copy speaks their exact language: "your audit team isn't ready for this level of holiday cheer" "finally, a sweater that says 'i do taxes and I party'" conversion rate: 8.7% (industry average: 2%) because he's not selling clothing. he's selling the perfect office party joke. revenue breakdown: - november: $1.3M - december: $1.7M - rest of year: $0 (he's on a beach) ad spend: $300k cogs: $400k profit: $2.3M works every single year. the lesson? stop trying to innovate. find a micro-niche so specific it's funny. print their inside joke on fabric. charge $49 for $5 worth of material. innovation is expensive. stupidity is profitable. the dumber the idea, the better it sells. most of you are too smart to make real money.

i know a guy running a $200k/month "agency" from his phone. no office. no employees. no brand. just 5 websites, 1 burner phone, and freelancers who don't know each other exist. here's the ghost kitchen model that's printing money: he's not building one agency. he's running five specialist "firms" simultaneously: - "SaaS Video Experts" - "Ecom Email Dominators" - "Law Firm SEO Authority" - "Crypto Marketing Masters" - "B2B LinkedIn Legends" each has its own site. different "founder" names. stock photos of different "teams." all forward to his one phone. step 1: lead comes in for "SaaS Video Experts." he's "Michael," the founder. closes for $10k. step 2: pays his serbian video editor $2k to deliver. pockets $8k. step 3: lead comes for "Law Firm SEO." he's "David." closes for $15k. pays pakistani SEO specialist $3k. pockets $12k. the arbitrage is beautiful: - no overhead (works from cafes) - no employees (just freelancer relationships) - no single point of failure (one niche dies, 4 others run) - no identity (he's 5 different people) his costs: - 5 domains: $50/month - 5 basic sites: $0 (used templates) - phone: $40/month - freelancer payments: 20-30% of revenue profit margin: 70-80% while traditional agencies have: - office leases - employee salaries - payroll taxes - HR nightmares - single brand risk he has pure arbitrage. scaled from 0 to $200k/month in 18 months. nobody knows his real name. the IRS knows him as an "independent consultant." your agency is a prison of overhead. his is a network of profit streams. one model is dying. one is thriving. both call themselves agencies.

why would you choose to be broke when you can just get rich? its literally that easy 😂