Get live statistics and analysis of Spectre's profile on X / Twitter

This is how women sabotage each other.

Women are adorably ret*rded.

Men that still don't want to understand the predisposition of women to lie in order to hide their dual mating strategy opt into their own destruction.

Open hypergamy will ensure that a critical mass of men takes the Redpill and will therefore never be able to look at women in the romanticist Bluepilled way ever again. The institution of marriage will not survive this. Women did this. They want this. Give them what they want.

The dual mating strategy is hard-coded into every single woman on this planet. It's your choice as a man whether you want to be the cleanup guy or the one to give her the tingles.

Matched a cute 24 year old girl on a dating app. Short banter, suggest drinks. "I need to know more about you first" Then proceeds to ask me about my job, my hobbies and what I search for on the app. Do disqualifying banter with a disappointed undertone, then answer the questions, smoothly lead back to the date suggestion. Tell her to drop me her number for meeting up. "I don't give my number out to strangers before meeting." Unmatched her. The women behaving like this on the apps are truly completely interchangeable. Sometimes word for word. Boring.

The reason why nightclubs are closing and parties are becoming emptier and emptier with every year is very simple: The chances for men to successfully get sexual with women they meet there are in free fall. Easy as that. And men simply do not go out if there is not even a basic, reasonable chance of sexual chemistry developing. That is because men do not care about the procedure of "fun" as much as they care about the chances of that "fun" leading to sex. And if these chances go from "regularly low" to "non-existent", then men will not attend your little Latin Party or your House club night. Men simply do not do all the silly things that girls do just for the sake of it without at least some sexual motivation. Yes I know most men these days are average frustrated chumps that don't deserve p*ssy. But that doesn't change the fact that less and less women that go out at night are open towards sexual chemistry. It's Briffault's law. Plain and simple.

I have gone on dates with well over a hundred women in the past couple of years in Western Europe and Eastern Europe and slept with 50 of them. The only women who are "good" and "want a comfortable, stable life" are... 1. of low sexual market value (SMV), i.e. don't have any actual high-value options, or 2. not willing to give you their best side in bed and genuine burning desire because they see you as the beta-bucks clean up guy after they had their party years. The "good woman" with the real deal of sexual and spiritual fulfilment for a healthy high-testosterone man is most definitely NOT a thing, no matter how much your bluepilled heart desires this to be the case.

I know a guy who is a criminal attorney. Not the best looking guy and not much rizz but he just said to me that he likes to take the girls to trial for their first date where they can sit in the audience and watch him at work. Said that makes them wet af. He's a shrewd one.

It is one of the most frustrating parts of female nature that it deems the man who learned charisma and Game as inferior to the man who naturally has it, because the former supposedly bypasses her hypergamous filters. Women do not reward you for showing them how you are putting in the work. On the contrary, they punish men for it. Female solipsism causes women to view a man putting effort into himself as suspicious. To them a man is either born a king or a slave. They are unaware of the potential for men to move up (and down) within their own intrasexual competition sphere. Women are not grateful beings and never will be. Which is why as a man you must never show women the process of your ongoing efforts and struggles, only the result.

Approached a woman in her mid 30s on the main square for fun because I was waiting for a mate and she looked hot in her dress. Was met with some of the weirdest, most off-putting, combative masculine energy that I had experienced in a long time. It was entertaining in this sort of watching-a-trainwreck way. She complained about men these days "crying too quickly". And I will never forget what she said afterwards: "Us women have balls, too. They just hang a little higher." (while clearly pointing at her boobs)

Matched a 28 y/o on Tinder. The way she texted showed nice effort but it seemed just a tiny bit too masculine. I sensed something might be off Maybe a catfish? So I suggested to switch to IG (instead of Whatsapp) for setting up the date (to see pix) ..and she's a single mom 🚫

That man must have had a guardian angel.

"I love him like a friend or brother" "We rarely have sex and when we do it's because I feel bad it's been so long" "I met someone at my new job." "He wants to change everything about himself so that I won't leave" Beta bucks life is a living hell.

Contrary to tradcons, maturity for a man is not about becoming ready to "settle down" or becoming the good providing workhorse in some other twisted way. Maturity for a man is about finally learning to not give a fuck about women's opinions and to operate within his own Frame.

The only way to fix this would be for her to start actively fucking his brains out and flood him with genuine burning desire. But she will never even consider that because he is a beta bucks guy that she married exclusively for provision in the first place.

Matched a cute 24 year old girl on a dating app. Short banter, suggest drinks. "I need to know more about you first" Then proceeds to ask me about my job, my hobbies and what I search for on the app. Do disqualifying banter with a disappointed undertone, then answer the questions, smoothly lead back to the date suggestion. Tell her to drop me her number for meeting up. "I don't give my number out to strangers before meeting." Unmatched her. The women behaving like this on the apps are truly completely interchangeable. Sometimes word for word. Boring.

The dual mating strategy is hard-coded into every single woman on this planet. It's your choice as a man whether you want to be the cleanup guy or the one to give her the tingles.

Open hypergamy will ensure that a critical mass of men takes the Redpill and will therefore never be able to look at women in the romanticist Bluepilled way ever again. The institution of marriage will not survive this. Women did this. They want this. Give them what they want.

This is how women sabotage each other.

The reason why nightclubs are closing and parties are becoming emptier and emptier with every year is very simple: The chances for men to successfully get sexual with women they meet there are in free fall. Easy as that. And men simply do not go out if there is not even a basic, reasonable chance of sexual chemistry developing. That is because men do not care about the procedure of "fun" as much as they care about the chances of that "fun" leading to sex. And if these chances go from "regularly low" to "non-existent", then men will not attend your little Latin Party or your House club night. Men simply do not do all the silly things that girls do just for the sake of it without at least some sexual motivation. Yes I know most men these days are average frustrated chumps that don't deserve p*ssy. But that doesn't change the fact that less and less women that go out at night are open towards sexual chemistry. It's Briffault's law. Plain and simple.

Men that still don't want to understand the predisposition of women to lie in order to hide their dual mating strategy opt into their own destruction.

I have gone on dates with well over a hundred women in the past couple of years in Western Europe and Eastern Europe and slept with 50 of them. The only women who are "good" and "want a comfortable, stable life" are... 1. of low sexual market value (SMV), i.e. don't have any actual high-value options, or 2. not willing to give you their best side in bed and genuine burning desire because they see you as the beta-bucks clean up guy after they had their party years. The "good woman" with the real deal of sexual and spiritual fulfilment for a healthy high-testosterone man is most definitely NOT a thing, no matter how much your bluepilled heart desires this to be the case.

Women are adorably ret*rded.

Approached a woman in her mid 30s on the main square for fun because I was waiting for a mate and she looked hot in her dress. Was met with some of the weirdest, most off-putting, combative masculine energy that I had experienced in a long time. It was entertaining in this sort of watching-a-trainwreck way. She complained about men these days "crying too quickly". And I will never forget what she said afterwards: "Us women have balls, too. They just hang a little higher." (while clearly pointing at her boobs)

That man must have had a guardian angel.

I know a guy who is a criminal attorney. Not the best looking guy and not much rizz but he just said to me that he likes to take the girls to trial for their first date where they can sit in the audience and watch him at work. Said that makes them wet af. He's a shrewd one.

"I love him like a friend or brother" "We rarely have sex and when we do it's because I feel bad it's been so long" "I met someone at my new job." "He wants to change everything about himself so that I won't leave" Beta bucks life is a living hell.

25 months. 47 lays. 1 threesome. Life could be worse.

+1 | 21 y/o | FDL from OLD (almost straight to my place) A 6. Matched on one the apps. She sort of declined my invitation straight to my place. I then suggested to go for a walk nearby first. Was inside her within 30 minutes after meeting her. She looked almost like this (AI).

It is one of the most frustrating parts of female nature that it deems the man who learned charisma and Game as inferior to the man who naturally has it, because the former supposedly bypasses her hypergamous filters. Women do not reward you for showing them how you are putting in the work. On the contrary, they punish men for it. Female solipsism causes women to view a man putting effort into himself as suspicious. To them a man is either born a king or a slave. They are unaware of the potential for men to move up (and down) within their own intrasexual competition sphere. Women are not grateful beings and never will be. Which is why as a man you must never show women the process of your ongoing efforts and struggles, only the result.

Matched a 28 y/o on Tinder. The way she texted showed nice effort but it seemed just a tiny bit too masculine. I sensed something might be off Maybe a catfish? So I suggested to switch to IG (instead of Whatsapp) for setting up the date (to see pix) ..and she's a single mom 🚫