Get live statistics and analysis of George Show's profile on X / Twitter

Naniga @world. Battery Man ,WoOH Vape Pods ,Bond DryNeedle ,BOME,3700 PLTR
The Connector
George Show is a prolific engager, connecting with diverse communities through retweets that highlight social issues, philosophical reflections, and humor. With over 12,000 tweets and a following count of more than 7,500, George thrives on networking and sharing content that sparks conversation. His profile is a hub of varied perspectives, always eager to bridge gaps between ideas and people.
George, the ultimate retweet machine! With a timeline that looks like a conveyor belt of other people’s thoughts, you might want to start a thread called 'George’s Greatest Hits' — except, plot twist, it’s someone else’s hits. Originality called; it’s wondering if you’re home.
The biggest win for George is mastering the art of strategic amplification—his profile has become a trusted relay station for important societal conversations, reflected in retweets that pull significant views and spark wider discussions.
George’s life purpose revolves around building connections and fostering dialogue across different spheres. By amplifying voices on social justice, personal values, and cultural commentary, he aims to nurture a community where diverse viewpoints intersect and inspire deeper understanding.
He values authenticity, justice, and independent thinking, frequently spotlighting ethical discussions and advocating for truth over bias. George believes in the power of collective awareness and that meaningful change emerges when people engage openly and thoughtfully.
George’s biggest strength is his vast network and ability to circulate important messages widely, leveraging the art of curation rather than original posting. His dedication to thoughtful retweeting positions him as a key amplifier in the social media ecosystem.
His weakness might be the lack of original commentary presence—relying heavily on retweets can make the profile seem detached or less personally authoritative, as there’s minimal direct engagement or audience interaction shown.
To grow his audience on X, George should infuse more original insights alongside his retweets to showcase his unique perspective. Engaging directly with followers through replies or polls and contextualizing shared content can boost his personal branding and transform followers into an active community.
Fun fact: Despite retweeting influential and sometimes complex content over 12,500 times, George maintains a unique balance by mixing serious social commentary with lighthearted posts, such as viral humor tweets that garner massive views.
Top tweets of George Show
整件事情的脉络: 家电巨头,美的集团,被网友曝光压榨工人,每天工作14小时以上,离职拖欠工资,公司威胁报复“别乱说,否则影响全家”。 女儿替父亲维权,被开盒,遭到警察上门警告,村支书亲自打电话给她 。

一个预判能力很强的人,不是事发后的力挽狂澜,而是事发前的预判,并成功将忧患扼杀于萌芽。运筹帷幄,目光高远,走一步看五走,走五步看十步,拥有这样能力的人,方能在人生舞台上从容起舞。
对查理·柯克之死幸灾乐祸的言论,以及由此引发的纷争都与“言论自由”无关! 要理解这个 问题,首先要理解言论自由的边界在哪里,也顺便明白自由的边界在哪里,而要明白这些,你首先要明白一个叫做“自由悖论”的东西。…
判断一个人的人品,就看他看问题是从是非出发,还是从立场和个人利益出发。从是非出发看问题的人人品一定不会差。深交三种人,一种是关心政治胸怀天下目光远大的人。一种是善良正直,嫉恶如仇,爱憎分明的人。还有一种是逻辑客观,脱离了低级趣味,有独立思考能力的人。
“查理·柯克的狡猾伎俩对剑桥大学那些知识分子大学生不起作用” 评论区说只剪辑了1分钟,恶意剪辑 我就好奇看了下完整10分钟的视频 只有一个感觉 科普,真的是一件很难,很难的事情 油管评论:“高等教育是一种威胁”,这句话很好地解释了查理。…
说到很多人转发的Charlie Kirk的「极端言论」,我发现有不少是来自于一种辩论技术:给对方设计一种极端两难的问题,逼迫他做出二选一的选择,他选择任何一个,都会是道德上的重大缺失,你就可以火力全开了。… t.co/PN…

