Get live statistics and analysis of Max's profile on X / Twitter

if you only work 20 hours a week but do it at odd hours everyone will think you work 100 hours a week

The dating pool for young men is literally: -whores - "nice" girls but who are obese and have an anxiety disorder -bitchy (if not cunty) girl bosses -BPD psychos who will love bomb you and then tell everyone you raped them -post wall "trad wifes" who actually want kids but only after spending their 20s riding the cock carousel

This woman is imprisoned for 20 years for a crime that we learned today very convincingly did not happen.

The first nurse in history to have a three digit IQ And they are going to IMPRISON her

All my wife’s neurotic lib friends are getting right wing boyfriends and becoming happy for the first time in their lives. This must be studied.

90% of “sexism” is actually women experiencing equality for the first time in their lives. Coddling women is so deeply conditioned into all normal, socially-well-adjusted men that most women are completely oblivious they are even being coddled. Only autistic STEM dudes unaware of these social rules treat women in a truly meritocratic, non-gendered fashion. And because that is way worse than anyone has ever treated them, they perceive it as bullying and abuse.

I can’t get over this response. If an entire team of researchers sat down for a year i think they would struggle to engineer a more optimal sentence.

The answer to this is very simple. 1. Women are a standard deviation higher in trait Agreeableness and trait Neuroticism than men. This is biological and mostly immutable. Both traits are very useful and valuable when used toward the things they evolved to be used for. Namely: Their compassion and politeness directed toward their in group (kids, friends, and family); and their neuroticism channeled into hyper-vigilance into making this group happy and cooperative. (The negatives of any extreme neuroticism were largely tempered or prevented entirely by men who protected them and their children). 2. College convinces women to redirect these traits away from the "their tribe" into the higher order tribe of "society". Women's biologically inbuilt worldview that "everyone should be nice to each other", "conflict should be avoided", and "the weak and helpless must be protected" is thus very easily "hijacked" and turned into a leftist political ideology. Why doing this is a really, really bad idea, is also rather simple. But would take another post to explain.

I will never not find it funny that the only examples leftists can point to as proof their ideas work (Scandanavia) are white ethnostates with populations smaller than new york city

Probably one of the deepest representations of our world that exists. Could write several thousand words on this video alone.

The purpose of a high IQ is to solve puzzles that other people need solved so they will give you money and status and power. If you waste this ability on video games and navel gazing about the horrors of existence, you are going to have a bad time.

Depression in men is mostly a product of being unable to bend his environment to his will.

It’s actually insane how like 95% of humans genuinely cannot comprehend that if you import third world policies, people, and culture into the first world, you will turn it into the third world. Even the immigrants themselves genuinely think the difference is just like magic dirt.

Many criticize the right for only caring about Iryna because she was hot. And they are correct. But the left only cared about Floyd because he was black. If my choice is between the side whose irrational bias valorizes a beautiful woman minding her own business or the side whose irrational bias valorizes a career felon and drug addict resisting arrest, i think im pretty happy with my choice.

Anyone making fun of this is an out of touch boomer

The most ironic thing here is that Sweeney is the archetypal bad bitch that every feminists dreams of becoming. Utterly mogged.

The dating pool for young men is literally: -whores - "nice" girls but who are obese and have an anxiety disorder -bitchy (if not cunty) girl bosses -BPD psychos who will love bomb you and then tell everyone you raped them -post wall "trad wifes" who actually want kids but only after spending their 20s riding the cock carousel

This woman is imprisoned for 20 years for a crime that we learned today very convincingly did not happen.

90% of “sexism” is actually women experiencing equality for the first time in their lives. Coddling women is so deeply conditioned into all normal, socially-well-adjusted men that most women are completely oblivious they are even being coddled. Only autistic STEM dudes unaware of these social rules treat women in a truly meritocratic, non-gendered fashion. And because that is way worse than anyone has ever treated them, they perceive it as bullying and abuse.

The answer to this is very simple. 1. Women are a standard deviation higher in trait Agreeableness and trait Neuroticism than men. This is biological and mostly immutable. Both traits are very useful and valuable when used toward the things they evolved to be used for. Namely: Their compassion and politeness directed toward their in group (kids, friends, and family); and their neuroticism channeled into hyper-vigilance into making this group happy and cooperative. (The negatives of any extreme neuroticism were largely tempered or prevented entirely by men who protected them and their children). 2. College convinces women to redirect these traits away from the "their tribe" into the higher order tribe of "society". Women's biologically inbuilt worldview that "everyone should be nice to each other", "conflict should be avoided", and "the weak and helpless must be protected" is thus very easily "hijacked" and turned into a leftist political ideology. Why doing this is a really, really bad idea, is also rather simple. But would take another post to explain.

Conservatives will never admit this but it is true. The founding fathers were the radical leftists of their time. The way the average con feels about crazy leftist transgender activists today is the way the average con of the 1700s felt about American Revolutionists.

reply with the hottest celeb you can think of and I will prove she is a 6

The purpose of a high IQ is to solve puzzles that other people need solved so they will give you money and status and power. If you waste this ability on video games and navel gazing about the horrors of existence, you are going to have a bad time.

All my wife’s neurotic lib friends are getting right wing boyfriends and becoming happy for the first time in their lives. This must be studied.

This is literally the breakfast question for the right. “Would the average brit of the 1700s think the founder fathers were left wing radicals?” “What do you mean? the founding fathers weren’t left wing radicals” “Not to you but would the average brit of the 1700s have called them left wing radicals?” “left wing radical wasn’t a term at that time” “Yes but when it was defined a decade later, would the average brit have used it to describe the founding fathers” “The founding fathers are right wing. Are you an idiot?”

Paying off your house early is the most retarded financial move you could possibly make. Imagine any other asset where you can get a risk free 10X leverage for 3% interest and then going “yeah actually i’m just going to reduce my LTV to 0% for no reason”

Somewhere between 120 and 135 IQ you shift from “really smart normie” to “strange autist”. It really is a categorically different kind of person with a totally different way of interfacing with and interpreting the world.

Many criticize the right for only caring about Iryna because she was hot. And they are correct. But the left only cared about Floyd because he was black. If my choice is between the side whose irrational bias valorizes a beautiful woman minding her own business or the side whose irrational bias valorizes a career felon and drug addict resisting arrest, i think im pretty happy with my choice.

This is actually one of the worst books in existence. It teaches you just enough about system dynamics to have a vague high level understanding about how they work, basically putting you right at the peak of Dunning Kruger Mount Stupid. And then spends the last like third of the book telling you how smart you are now and to go be an activist and fuck with complex systems. Probably like 90% of all the retarded policy and cultural changes that midwit academics implement that end up destroying society stem from system dynamics theory retards like Meadows.

Anyone making fun of this is an out of touch boomer

I will never not find it funny that the only examples leftists can point to as proof their ideas work (Scandanavia) are white ethnostates with populations smaller than new york city

I still cannot get over the fact that the modern left and right map almost perfectly on to feminine and masculine archetypes and that no one talks about this. This is especially true at the extremes, where the far left is basically a 1 to 1 representation of the devouring mother and the far right the tyrannical father. Devouring mother/far left: smoothers independence under the guise of care and protection. Safetyist, infantilizing, enmeshing; obsessed with comfort, equity, inclusion. Tyrannical father/far right: enforces rigid order through fear and dominance. Valorizes law, order, strength, patriarchy. exclusionary, preservationist, punishes deviation, etc. Even our status measures of “woke” vs “based” are effectively questions of how well you manifest the devouring mother or tyrannical father. Like when a groyper says “We should gas the j*ws, deport the blacks, enslave the women, and re establish the monarchy” We all go “UM HELLO BASED DEPARTMENT???” The same thing exists on the left just regarding suicidally empathetic propositions of self sacrifice. It is obviously mostly ironic on the right, and mostly performative on the left, but the fact that these are effectively the measures of your social media credit score is very interesting and worth further exploration.